High expression of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) in epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. IGF-II transcription is initiated from multiple promoters. Promoter-specific expression is regulated by DNA methylation, which is often dysregulated in cancer. Here, the effects of promoter-specific methylation on IGF-II expression are investigated in ovarian cancer. Fresh tumor samples were collected from 211 patients for analyses of IGF-II promoter methylation using methylation-specific PCR, and of promoter-specific expression of IGF-II mRNA with qRT-PCR, as well as tissue levels of IGF-II peptide with an ELISA. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess IGF-II methylation and expression in association with progression-free and overall survival. DNA methylation was high in IGF-II promoters 2 (P2, 64.2%) and 3 (P3, 52.1%) and low in promoter 4 (P4, 9.8%). High methylation was associated with low mRNA expression in a promoter-specific manner. P3 methylation and expression appeared to be critical in ovarian cancer compared to other promoters. While methylation in an individual promoter was not associated with the disease, a methylation pattern involving P2 and P3 was significantly different among patients with distinct tumor grade, debulking results, residual tumor size and treatment response. The methylation pattern was also associated with disease progression. The study suggests that DNA methylation regulates IGF-II promoter-specific expression in ovarian cancer and the regulation may play a role in disease progression. Assessing methylation patterns in IGF-II promoters may have clinical implications.

IGF-II promoter specific methylation and expression in epithelial ovarian cancer and their associations with disease characteristics.

BENEDETTO, Chiara;
2011-01-01

Abstract

High expression of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) in epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. IGF-II transcription is initiated from multiple promoters. Promoter-specific expression is regulated by DNA methylation, which is often dysregulated in cancer. Here, the effects of promoter-specific methylation on IGF-II expression are investigated in ovarian cancer. Fresh tumor samples were collected from 211 patients for analyses of IGF-II promoter methylation using methylation-specific PCR, and of promoter-specific expression of IGF-II mRNA with qRT-PCR, as well as tissue levels of IGF-II peptide with an ELISA. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess IGF-II methylation and expression in association with progression-free and overall survival. DNA methylation was high in IGF-II promoters 2 (P2, 64.2%) and 3 (P3, 52.1%) and low in promoter 4 (P4, 9.8%). High methylation was associated with low mRNA expression in a promoter-specific manner. P3 methylation and expression appeared to be critical in ovarian cancer compared to other promoters. While methylation in an individual promoter was not associated with the disease, a methylation pattern involving P2 and P3 was significantly different among patients with distinct tumor grade, debulking results, residual tumor size and treatment response. The methylation pattern was also associated with disease progression. The study suggests that DNA methylation regulates IGF-II promoter-specific expression in ovarian cancer and the regulation may play a role in disease progression. Assessing methylation patterns in IGF-II promoters may have clinical implications.
2011
25
1
203
213
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc
IGF-II; methylation; epithelial ovarian cancer; prognosis
Qian B; Katsaros D; Lu L; Canuto EM; Benedetto C; Beeghly-Fadiel A; Yu H.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
500485.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 898.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
898.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/80635
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact