Our representation of peripersonal space does not always accurately reflect the physical world. An example of this is pseudoneglect, a phenomenon in which neurologically normal individuals bisect to the left of the veridical midpoint, reflecting an overrepresentation of the left portion of space compared with the right one. Consistent biases have also been observed in the vertical and radial planes. It is an open question whether these biases depend on normal visual experience for their occurrence. Here we systematically investigated this issue by testing blindfolded sighted and early blind individuals in a haptic line bisection task. Critically, we found a robust leftward bias in all participants. In the vertical and radial planes, sighted participants showed a consistent downward and proximal bias. Conversely, the directional bias in blind participants was dependent on the final movement direction; thus, there was no general bias in either direction. These findings are discussed in terms of different reference frames adopted by sighted and blind participants when encoding space.

Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm

TINTI, Carla;
2011-01-01

Abstract

Our representation of peripersonal space does not always accurately reflect the physical world. An example of this is pseudoneglect, a phenomenon in which neurologically normal individuals bisect to the left of the veridical midpoint, reflecting an overrepresentation of the left portion of space compared with the right one. Consistent biases have also been observed in the vertical and radial planes. It is an open question whether these biases depend on normal visual experience for their occurrence. Here we systematically investigated this issue by testing blindfolded sighted and early blind individuals in a haptic line bisection task. Critically, we found a robust leftward bias in all participants. In the vertical and radial planes, sighted participants showed a consistent downward and proximal bias. Conversely, the directional bias in blind participants was dependent on the final movement direction; thus, there was no general bias in either direction. These findings are discussed in terms of different reference frames adopted by sighted and blind participants when encoding space.
2011
37(4)
1110
1121
spatial representation; early blind; haptic line bisection; pseudoneglect
Cattaneo Z.; Fantino M.; Tinti C.; Pascual-Leone A.; Silvanto J.; Vecchi T.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
tinti2.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 677.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
677.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
TINTI2011Spatial biases.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 237.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
237.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/93183
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact