Single-port access laparoscopy has recently been proposed to reduce skin incisions and related pain and morbidity. Aim was to compare short-term results after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) and conventional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) reported in RCTs. A systematic review of RCTs published as of 31 December 2011 and comparing SPLC versus MPLC was performed (PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42011001880). The primary endpoint was overall morbidity. A fix…

Is single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe?Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

AREZZO, Alberto;SCOZZARI, Gitana;MORINO, Mario
2012-01-01

Abstract

Single-port access laparoscopy has recently been proposed to reduce skin incisions and related pain and morbidity. Aim was to compare short-term results after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) and conventional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) reported in RCTs. A systematic review of RCTs published as of 31 December 2011 and comparing SPLC versus MPLC was performed (PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42011001880). The primary endpoint was overall morbidity. A fix…
2012
UEG Week 2012 (United European Gastroenterology Federation)
Amsterdam
20-24 October
61(3)
A148
A148
GUT
A. Arezzo; G. Scozzari; F. Famiglietti; R. Passera; M. Morino
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/119508
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact