While definitive long-term results are awaited, safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treatment remains controversial. Aim of the study was to evaluate differences in safety of laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer, compared with open surgery. A systematic review from 2000 to 2010 was performed using MESH terms: “laparoscopy”, “minimally invasive”, “colorectal neoplasms”. We included RCTs and prospective controlled clinical studies comparing laparoscopic versus op…

Is laparoscopic resection for extraperitoneal rectal cancer safe? Results of a systematic rewiew and meta-analysis

AREZZO, Alberto;SCOZZARI, Gitana;VERRA, Mauro;MORINO, Mario
2012-01-01

Abstract

While definitive long-term results are awaited, safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treatment remains controversial. Aim of the study was to evaluate differences in safety of laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer, compared with open surgery. A systematic review from 2000 to 2010 was performed using MESH terms: “laparoscopy”, “minimally invasive”, “colorectal neoplasms”. We included RCTs and prospective controlled clinical studies comparing laparoscopic versus op…
2012
UEG Week 2012 (United European Gastroenterology Federation)
Amsterdam
20-24 October
61
(3)
A266
A266
GUT
A. Arezzo; R. Passera; G. Scozzari; M. Verra; M. Morino
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/119509
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact