Short communication: Economic impact among 7 reproductive programs for lactating dairy cows, including a sensitivity analysis of the cost of hormonal treatments

Although hormonal synchronization programs can improve reproductive efficiency of dairy herds, some farmers question the economics of these programs based on the upfront cost of hormonal treatments as opposed to the economic value of the resulting reproductive performance. Our aim was to compare the economic impact of reproductive management programs that incorporate varying degrees of detection of estrus and timed artificial insemination (AI) in dairy herds with year-round calving in confinement total mixed ration systems. A reproductive economic analysis simulation model was used to compare the economic impact of pairs of reproductive management programs. We simulated sets of scenarios for 2 analyses. In the first analysis, we calculated the economic impact of switching from a Presynch-Ovsynch program to a Double-Ovsynch program that included a second PGF2α treatment during the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of the program (Double-Ovsynch+PGF). In the second analysis, we conducted a break-even analysis in which the cost of hormonal treatments was incrementally increased within various reproductive management programs. Our analyses revealed that a Double-Ovsynch+PGF program, the most intensive program evaluated, was more profitable than other programs compared, including a Presynch-Ovsynch program with 100% timed AI or a Presynch-Ovsynch program that incorporated detection of estrus, despite the higher upfront cost incurred by using more hormonal treatments. This advantage remained until the cost of hormones was increased 5 to 14 times current US market prices and 2 to 6 times current European market prices. The cost of GnRH had a greater impact on net profit gain than the cost of PGF2α. In conclusion, more intensive reproductive programs that use more hormonal treatments but result in substantially increased reproductive performance are more profitable than less intensive programs and remain so even if hormone prices are unusually high.