Species determination is a crucial step in wooden cultural artefacts diagnostic process. Not only it actually represents the key to physical and mechanical properties of a wooden object, but a precious instrument for its cultural understanding too. Scientific wood identification by microscopic analysis currently represents the most reliable and practicable technique. Since both this method is affected by biological limitations and most of the artefacts present sampling limitations, it is however impossible to predict end result accuracy and hence survey usefulness. Non-invasive alternatives to the common sampling procedure are hence preferable, when not necessary in the case of objects that do not permit sampling at all. Objective of this paper is to present some preliminary results of a study held in order to evaluate the usefulness of reflected light microscopy as a noninvasive identification tool. Different surfacing and finishing treatments with reference to typical ancient manufacturing methods were reproduced on selected species. The visibility of anatomical features was then evaluated on the basis of a four level scale. Two indexes were created to evaluate both differences between treatments effects and single anatomical feature hardness of identification. Surfacing affected anatomical features visibility at different degrees of severity depending both on adopted technique and species, while finishes partially improved or worsened it. Each anatomical feature demonstrated to have different susceptibility towards treatments, showing distinct identification hardness. For an evaluation of the reflected light microscopy potential as a non-invasive identification tool, a further study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of polarized and narrow-band filters has been fixed up.

Potential of reflected light microscopy as a non-invasive identification tool on wooden cultural artefacts – preliminary results

RUFFINATTO, FLAVIO;BOETTO, Guido Alessandro;ZANUTTINI, Roberto
2009-01-01

Abstract

Species determination is a crucial step in wooden cultural artefacts diagnostic process. Not only it actually represents the key to physical and mechanical properties of a wooden object, but a precious instrument for its cultural understanding too. Scientific wood identification by microscopic analysis currently represents the most reliable and practicable technique. Since both this method is affected by biological limitations and most of the artefacts present sampling limitations, it is however impossible to predict end result accuracy and hence survey usefulness. Non-invasive alternatives to the common sampling procedure are hence preferable, when not necessary in the case of objects that do not permit sampling at all. Objective of this paper is to present some preliminary results of a study held in order to evaluate the usefulness of reflected light microscopy as a noninvasive identification tool. Different surfacing and finishing treatments with reference to typical ancient manufacturing methods were reproduced on selected species. The visibility of anatomical features was then evaluated on the basis of a four level scale. Two indexes were created to evaluate both differences between treatments effects and single anatomical feature hardness of identification. Surfacing affected anatomical features visibility at different degrees of severity depending both on adopted technique and species, while finishes partially improved or worsened it. Each anatomical feature demonstrated to have different susceptibility towards treatments, showing distinct identification hardness. For an evaluation of the reflected light microscopy potential as a non-invasive identification tool, a further study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of polarized and narrow-band filters has been fixed up.
2009
COST Action IE0601 “Wood Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage”
Hamburg
7-10 ottobre 2009
International Conference on Wooden Cultural Heritage: Evaluation of Deterioration and Management of Change
Wood Technology and Wood Biology (HTB), Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) / Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Hamburg
64
64
F. Ruffinatto; N.Macchioni; G. Boetto; R. Zanuttini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ruffinatto[1].pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 787.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
787.49 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Abstract-booklet-Noldt-10042009minus3[1].pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: MATERIALE NON BIBLIOGRAFICO
Dimensione 1.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/82371
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact