Antigenic lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) rely on the non-competitive sandwich format, including a detection (labelled) antibody and a capture antibody immobilised onto the analytical membrane. When the same antibody is used for the capture and the detection (single epitope immunoassay), the saturation of analyte epitopes by the probe compromises the capture and lowers the sensitivity. Hence, several factors, including the amount of the probe, the antibody-to-label ratio, and the contact time between the probe and the analyte before reaching the capture antibody, must be adjusted. We explored different designs of experiments (full-factorial, optimal, sub-optimal models) to optimise a multiplex sandwich-type LFIA for the diagnosis and serotyping of two Southern African Territory (SAT) serotypes of the foot-and-mouth disease virus, and to evaluate the reduction of the number of experiments in the development. Both assays employed single epitope sandwich, so most influencing variables on the sensitivity were studied and individuated. We upgraded a previous device increasing the sensitivity by a factor of two and reached the visual limit of detection of 10^3.7 and 10^4.0 (TCID/mL) for SAT 1 and SAT 2, respectively. The positioning of the capture region along the LFIA strip was the most influent variable to increase the detectability. Furthermore, we confirmed that the 13-optimal DoE was the most convenient approach for designing the device

Experimental design for the development of a multiplex antigen lateral flow immunoassay detecting the Southern African Territory (SAT) serotypes of foot‑and‑mouth disease virus

Cavalera, S.
First
;
Alladio, E.;Colitti, B.;Rosati, S.;Nogarol, C.;Di Nardo, F.;Serra, T.;Testa, V.;Baggiani, C.;Anfossi, L
Last
2024-01-01

Abstract

Antigenic lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) rely on the non-competitive sandwich format, including a detection (labelled) antibody and a capture antibody immobilised onto the analytical membrane. When the same antibody is used for the capture and the detection (single epitope immunoassay), the saturation of analyte epitopes by the probe compromises the capture and lowers the sensitivity. Hence, several factors, including the amount of the probe, the antibody-to-label ratio, and the contact time between the probe and the analyte before reaching the capture antibody, must be adjusted. We explored different designs of experiments (full-factorial, optimal, sub-optimal models) to optimise a multiplex sandwich-type LFIA for the diagnosis and serotyping of two Southern African Territory (SAT) serotypes of the foot-and-mouth disease virus, and to evaluate the reduction of the number of experiments in the development. Both assays employed single epitope sandwich, so most influencing variables on the sensitivity were studied and individuated. We upgraded a previous device increasing the sensitivity by a factor of two and reached the visual limit of detection of 10^3.7 and 10^4.0 (TCID/mL) for SAT 1 and SAT 2, respectively. The positioning of the capture region along the LFIA strip was the most influent variable to increase the detectability. Furthermore, we confirmed that the 13-optimal DoE was the most convenient approach for designing the device
2024
191
9
19
Cavalera, S.; Alladio, E.; Foglia, E.A.; Grazioli, S.; Colitti, B.; Rosati, S.; Nogarol, C.; Di Nardo, F.; Serra, T.; Testa, V.; B...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
mca24_191_9.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 2.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.73 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
mca24_191_9_draft.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 906.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
906.61 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1951908
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact