Eleven parameters (ether extract, EE; SFA; MUFA; PUFA; n-3; n-6; PUFA/SFA, n-6/n-3, h/H ratios; AI, TI indices) obtained from fat content and fatty acids profile of longissimus thoracis muscle of Piemontese (P), Friesian (F) and Limousin (L) breeds were considered. The data were analysed by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). HCA produced three clusters. The first cluster was characterized by L animals (6/11), the second by P (8/10) the third by F (6/10); EE, SFA, MUFA contents, PUFA/SFA ratio, AI and h/H indices significantly differed between breeds. PCA showed that PC1 differentiates between fatty and lean meat; F had a higher EE, SFA and MUFA content and also unfavourables AI and TI indices; P beef showed a better PUFA/SFA and h/H ratios and an unfavourable n-6/n-3 ratio. CDA showed that MUFA, EE, SFA and PUFA/SFA, TI index, n-3, AI and h/H ratio were the most discriminating variables. The 80.6% of grouped cases were correctly classified; function 2 was able to distinguish P and L groups; P group has a better PUFA/SFA ratio, while L had a better TI and a higher n-3 content.
CHARACTERIZATION OF BEEF FATTY ACID PROFILE BY MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
BRUGIAPAGLIA, Alberto;DESTEFANIS, Gianluigi;LUSSIANA, Carola
2013-01-01
Abstract
Eleven parameters (ether extract, EE; SFA; MUFA; PUFA; n-3; n-6; PUFA/SFA, n-6/n-3, h/H ratios; AI, TI indices) obtained from fat content and fatty acids profile of longissimus thoracis muscle of Piemontese (P), Friesian (F) and Limousin (L) breeds were considered. The data were analysed by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). HCA produced three clusters. The first cluster was characterized by L animals (6/11), the second by P (8/10) the third by F (6/10); EE, SFA, MUFA contents, PUFA/SFA ratio, AI and h/H indices significantly differed between breeds. PCA showed that PC1 differentiates between fatty and lean meat; F had a higher EE, SFA and MUFA content and also unfavourables AI and TI indices; P beef showed a better PUFA/SFA and h/H ratios and an unfavourable n-6/n-3 ratio. CDA showed that MUFA, EE, SFA and PUFA/SFA, TI index, n-3, AI and h/H ratio were the most discriminating variables. The 80.6% of grouped cases were correctly classified; function 2 was able to distinguish P and L groups; P group has a better PUFA/SFA ratio, while L had a better TI and a higher n-3 content.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Brugiapaglia IZMIR 1.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
86.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
86.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.