This study is part of a wider project aiming to correlate the chemical composition of the volatile fraction of coffee to its sensory properties, in order to develop an instrumental analytical method complementary to human sensory profiling [1][2]. The proposed investigation strategy compares the chemical information on coffee aroma and flavor obtained by sampling the matrix with three different HCC sampling techniques coupled on-line or off-line with GC-MS [3]. HS-SPME of the ground coffee and in-solution SBSE/HS-SPME sampling of the coffee brew were considered for a reliable aroma and flavor characterization and profiling [4] to evaluate their compatibility with the cupping evaluation in coffee selection for quality control purposes [5]. Eight roasted coffee samples with particular sensory properties were analyzed. Chemical results obtained by three sampling techniques were compared through multivariate analysis, and related to the samples’ sensorial attributes. PCA revealed different direct discriminant compounds describing the sample distribution related to the sampling technique used; this difference is linked to the particular phsysico-chemical properties of the coffee aroma and flavor compounds that are differently exploited by the three sampling techniques. Chemometric results showed the same sample distribution, suggesting that the sampling techniques under study provide the same chemical information about the samples. The sensorial description of samples was in agreement with the chemical results obtained by each sampling approach, despite their differences, highlighting their interchangeability.
COFFEE AROMA INVESTIGATION: A CHEMOMETRIC COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THREE HCC SAMPLING TECHNIQUES CHEMICALLY DESCRIBING THE SENSORY PROPERTIES OF THE CUP
BRESSANELLO, DAVIDE;LIBERTO, Erica;CORDERO, Chiara Emilia Irma;RUBIOLO, Patrizia;BICCHI, Carlo
2016-01-01
Abstract
This study is part of a wider project aiming to correlate the chemical composition of the volatile fraction of coffee to its sensory properties, in order to develop an instrumental analytical method complementary to human sensory profiling [1][2]. The proposed investigation strategy compares the chemical information on coffee aroma and flavor obtained by sampling the matrix with three different HCC sampling techniques coupled on-line or off-line with GC-MS [3]. HS-SPME of the ground coffee and in-solution SBSE/HS-SPME sampling of the coffee brew were considered for a reliable aroma and flavor characterization and profiling [4] to evaluate their compatibility with the cupping evaluation in coffee selection for quality control purposes [5]. Eight roasted coffee samples with particular sensory properties were analyzed. Chemical results obtained by three sampling techniques were compared through multivariate analysis, and related to the samples’ sensorial attributes. PCA revealed different direct discriminant compounds describing the sample distribution related to the sampling technique used; this difference is linked to the particular phsysico-chemical properties of the coffee aroma and flavor compounds that are differently exploited by the three sampling techniques. Chemometric results showed the same sample distribution, suggesting that the sampling techniques under study provide the same chemical information about the samples. The sensorial description of samples was in agreement with the chemical results obtained by each sampling approach, despite their differences, highlighting their interchangeability.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Poster_Bressanello_coffee.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Full Text
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
1.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Acceptation_Poster_Coffee_40th ISCC_0386.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Abstract
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
33.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
33.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.