Objectives: Plant-based burgers are increasingly being adopted by consumers as a substitute for meat burgers [1]. Given the importance of digestibility and the few researches that have been done on it in plant-based burgers, the objective of this research was to compare the digestibility of plant-based and meat burgers, applying an in vitro digestibility procedure for swine. Materials and Methods: The digestibility was measured on seven types of burgers: 1 meat burger (MT), 2 commercials (CB and CE) and 4 not commercial (P1 to P4) plant-based burgers, all with pea as protein base. Ten meat burgers and six burgers for each plant-based type were analyzed in duplicate for a total of 92 samples. They were lyophilized before doing the in vitro digestibility analysis. Given the similarity between the human and pig digestive systems [2], an enzymatic in vitro method normally utilized to test feed digestibility in swine was used [3]. Samples were digested during 3 steps: acid pepsin digestion, pancreatin digestion and Viscozyme digestion. It allowed to measure ileal (Id) total (Td) and fiber digestibility (Fd). The 3 values of digestibility were calculated as follows: Id= (wbi-wai2)/wbi Td= (wbi-wai3)/wbi Fd= (wai2-wai3)/ wai2 Id= ileal digestibility, Td= total digestibility, Fd= fiber digestibility, wbi= weight of samples before incubation, wai2= weight of samples after 2nd step, wai3=weight of samples after 3rd step. The Daisy Incubator (Ankom Technology Corporation Fairport, NY, USA) was used to carry out the analysis. All data were analyzed with SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results and Discussion: Plant-based not commercial burgers and commercial burger CE had a significant higher ileal digestibility (from 64.6% to 70.6%) than meat and commercial burger CB (48.2% and 47.9%). The same significant trend was found for total digestibility (from 76.6% to 81.1% for plant-based not commercial burgers and CE; 58.7% and 57.8% for meat and CB). At con- trary fiber digestibility was similar in all types of burgers (from 2% to 3.9%). The higher ileal and total digestibility of plant-based types may be due to the different protein-lipid interactions that occurs in meat and its plant-based analogs. These bonds are stronger in meat making stomach digestion more difficult [4]. Similar results for Ileal and total digestibility were found by other authors [4], that found stomach digestibility higher in plant- based burgers then in meat, while intestinal digestibility was higher in real meat. Moreover, we found that the use of this in vitro digestibility technique reduces costs, laboratory intensity and time compared to methods normally used to analyze food digestibility [3;4]. Conclusions: This is the first study in which enzymatic method utilized in pig digestibility studies adapted to Ankom DaisyII Instrument was used to analyze food, allowing to compare the digestibility of plant-based and meat burgers. This method has proven to be advantageous in terms of time and laboriousness. The results obtained were very promising, and plant-based burgers showed higher digestibility than meat burgers. Further studies are needed to confirm and extend these results in view of a more sustainable consumption of protein foods.

Digestibility of plant-based and meat burgers using an in vitro protocol for swine

Sara Glorio Patrucco
;
Salvatore Barbera;Sabah Mabrouki;Sonia Tassone
2022-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: Plant-based burgers are increasingly being adopted by consumers as a substitute for meat burgers [1]. Given the importance of digestibility and the few researches that have been done on it in plant-based burgers, the objective of this research was to compare the digestibility of plant-based and meat burgers, applying an in vitro digestibility procedure for swine. Materials and Methods: The digestibility was measured on seven types of burgers: 1 meat burger (MT), 2 commercials (CB and CE) and 4 not commercial (P1 to P4) plant-based burgers, all with pea as protein base. Ten meat burgers and six burgers for each plant-based type were analyzed in duplicate for a total of 92 samples. They were lyophilized before doing the in vitro digestibility analysis. Given the similarity between the human and pig digestive systems [2], an enzymatic in vitro method normally utilized to test feed digestibility in swine was used [3]. Samples were digested during 3 steps: acid pepsin digestion, pancreatin digestion and Viscozyme digestion. It allowed to measure ileal (Id) total (Td) and fiber digestibility (Fd). The 3 values of digestibility were calculated as follows: Id= (wbi-wai2)/wbi Td= (wbi-wai3)/wbi Fd= (wai2-wai3)/ wai2 Id= ileal digestibility, Td= total digestibility, Fd= fiber digestibility, wbi= weight of samples before incubation, wai2= weight of samples after 2nd step, wai3=weight of samples after 3rd step. The Daisy Incubator (Ankom Technology Corporation Fairport, NY, USA) was used to carry out the analysis. All data were analyzed with SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results and Discussion: Plant-based not commercial burgers and commercial burger CE had a significant higher ileal digestibility (from 64.6% to 70.6%) than meat and commercial burger CB (48.2% and 47.9%). The same significant trend was found for total digestibility (from 76.6% to 81.1% for plant-based not commercial burgers and CE; 58.7% and 57.8% for meat and CB). At con- trary fiber digestibility was similar in all types of burgers (from 2% to 3.9%). The higher ileal and total digestibility of plant-based types may be due to the different protein-lipid interactions that occurs in meat and its plant-based analogs. These bonds are stronger in meat making stomach digestion more difficult [4]. Similar results for Ileal and total digestibility were found by other authors [4], that found stomach digestibility higher in plant- based burgers then in meat, while intestinal digestibility was higher in real meat. Moreover, we found that the use of this in vitro digestibility technique reduces costs, laboratory intensity and time compared to methods normally used to analyze food digestibility [3;4]. Conclusions: This is the first study in which enzymatic method utilized in pig digestibility studies adapted to Ankom DaisyII Instrument was used to analyze food, allowing to compare the digestibility of plant-based and meat burgers. This method has proven to be advantageous in terms of time and laboriousness. The results obtained were very promising, and plant-based burgers showed higher digestibility than meat burgers. Further studies are needed to confirm and extend these results in view of a more sustainable consumption of protein foods.
2022
68th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology
Kobe, Japan
22-25 August 2022
Japanese Journal of Meat Science and Technology
Nihon shokuniku kagakkai
63
341
341
Plant-based burgers, Meat burgers, In vitro digestibility, Pig enzymes, Ankom DaisyII instrument
Sara Glorio Patrucco, Salvatore Barbera, Sabah Mabrouki, Sonia Tassone
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DIG.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 265.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
265.41 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1887737
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact